Skip to content
How to ThinkIn the Age of AI

Write your position before group discussion, compare…

Before group discussions where conformity pressure is likely, write down your position privately in one sentence before the discussion begins, then compare what you wrote with what you actually said afterward to detect whether social pressure eroded your position.

When This Fires

  • Before any group meeting where you hold a minority position
  • Before discussions where the most senior person's view will likely dominate
  • When you have a history of "going along" in meetings and regretting it afterward
  • Complements For 6+ person decisions, collect independent written… (independent written assessment before group discussion) with the personal position-anchoring version

Common Failure Mode

Not writing the position: "I know what I think — I don't need to write it down." Under group pressure, what you "know you think" shifts in real-time (When an objection dissolves from social pressure… — objections dissolve from social pressure). The written anchor is the objective record that social pressure can't rewrite.

The Protocol

(1) Before the group discussion begins (in the meeting room, before others arrive, or during the pre-meeting preparation), write one specific sentence: "My position on [topic] is [specific stance] because [key reason]." (2) During the discussion: participate normally. Don't reference the written position. (3) After the discussion: compare what you wrote with what you actually said and decided. Match → your position survived group pressure. Divergence with new reasoning → you were genuinely persuaded (healthy). Divergence without new reasoning → conformity eroded your position. Log the pressure type (When pressure changes your decision, document both…). (4) Track over time: how often does conformity erode your position? In which contexts? This builds the vulnerability map.