Classify every behavior as designed or default…
Classify each observed behavior as designed (you can identify the installation decision) or default (no identifiable decision point) during audits, treating the classification question itself as a detection mechanism for unexamined automation.
When This Fires
- During behavioral audits (Audit agents with hourly momentary sampling…) when cataloging observed behaviors
- When you notice a recurring behavior and wonder "why do I do this?"
- During agent inventory when distinguishing consciously installed behaviors from inherited patterns
- When simplifying your behavioral portfolio — defaults with no clear purpose are prime candidates for removal
Common Failure Mode
Retroactively claiming defaults were designed: "I check email first thing because I decided it's important to stay responsive." Did you actually decide that, or did the behavior start before you had a rationale for it? The rationalization test: if you can't name when you made the decision and what alternatives you considered, the behavior is likely a default wearing a post-hoc justification costume.
The Protocol
(1) During a behavioral audit, for each observed behavior, ask: "Can I identify a specific moment when I decided to adopt this behavior?" (2) If yes → designed. Record when and why you installed it. Check: is the original reason still valid? (3) If no → default. Record it as unexamined automation. Ask: if I were designing my behavior from scratch, would I choose this? (4) For defaults you'd keep → convert them to designed agents by explicitly endorsing them (now they have a decision point). (5) For defaults you wouldn't choose → redesign or remove. These are behaviors running on your resources without your conscious authorization.