Define values so an observer could predict your behavior…
Define each abstract value with operational specificity by writing one to three sentences that would enable an observer to predict your behavior in concrete situations, not dictionary definitions.
When This Fires
- When articulating values for use in the hierarchy (Use lexicographic ordering for value conflicts-606)
- When an abstract value ("growth," "excellence," "authenticity") doesn't provide decision guidance
- When two people claim the same value but behave differently — their operational definitions differ
- When you want your values to function as decision-making infrastructure rather than abstract aspirations
Common Failure Mode
Dictionary definitions: "Integrity: the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles." This definition applies to billions of people and distinguishes your specific commitment from nobody's. An operational definition should be uniquely yours: it should predict your specific behavior in situations relevant to your life.
The Protocol
(1) For each abstract value, write 1-3 sentences that meet this test: "If someone read this definition and then watched me make a decision in a relevant situation, could they predict what I'd choose?" (2) The definition should specify: what behavior the value produces, in what contexts, and what it would cost you (what you'd give up to honor it). (3) Test: describe a concrete situation where the value is at stake. Does your definition predict a specific choice? If it's compatible with multiple choices → too abstract. Narrow it. (4) Example: Abstract: "I value learning." Operational: "I allocate 5+ hours per week to skill acquisition in areas where I'm not yet competent, even when existing competencies would be more productive in the short term. I choose growth-producing discomfort over efficiency-producing comfort." (5) Review operational definitions annually: do they still predict your behavior accurately?