Skip to content
How to ThinkIn the Age of AI

When your mind says 'risky' or 'bad,' expand it — what…

When your inner monologue compresses a concern into a single-word assessment like '...risky,' immediately expand it in writing by specifying subject, object, and specific mechanism to decompress the elided context.

When This Fires

  • You catch yourself thinking in single-word assessments: "risky," "bad," "promising," "wrong," "solid"
  • You're about to share a compressed assessment in a meeting or conversation
  • A feeling about a decision persists without a clear articulation of why
  • Any time an internal assessment feels "obvious" but you can't explain it in two sentences

Common Failure Mode

Expanding the word into a slightly longer but still vague sentence. "Risky" becomes "it seems risky because of the timeline" — still compressed, still missing specifics. The expansion must include subject (what's at risk), object (who bears the risk), and mechanism (how the risk materializes). "The database migration is risky because a 3-hour maintenance window under production load could cause data loss for active users if the rollback script fails" — now you can evaluate it.

The Protocol

When you notice a single-word assessment in your inner monologue: (1) Write the word down. (2) Expand by answering: What is [word]? For whom? Through what mechanism? Compared to what alternative? (3) Read the expansion. Often, the specific version reveals either that the concern is legitimate and actionable, or that the vague feeling was based on an assumption you can now check. Either outcome is better than acting on "...risky."