The irreducible epistemic atoms underlying the curriculum. 4,828 atoms across 8 types and 2 molecules
Train interoceptive awareness through systematic body-scanning practices to detect somatic markers early enough to intervene before automatic responses execute.
Start behavioral triggers with a more conservative threshold than feels right, aiming for 3-5 activations per day rather than 30, to build trust through relevance before expanding sensitivity.
Log each trigger firing for one week as true positive or false positive, then adjust the threshold only after accumulating empirical data rather than based on single instances.
Add qualifying guard clauses to behavioral triggers when false positives exceed 30% of total activations, inserting context checks that must pass before the main action executes.
Match the number of qualifying conditions to the cost of false positives—use minimal guards for low-cost triggers and multiple defensive checks for high-consequence triggers.
When a trigger consistently fails to fire, increase its signal strength through modality shift, physical obstruction, temporal isolation, implementation intentions, or redundant cueing rather than attempting to 'remember better.'
Position physical trigger cues at the exact decision fork where competing behaviors diverge, not merely in the same room, because triggers must intercept choice at the moment it occurs.
Audit your actual movement patterns through physical space before placing any environmental triggers, because triggers placed on aspirational paths rather than real paths will never fire.
For each digital trigger, encode the complete action protocol in the notification text itself ('Daily Review — 3 wins, 1 lesson, tomorrow's top 3') rather than generic labels, to eliminate decision-making at activation.
Design social accountability around process questions ('Did you write for 30 minutes?') rather than outcome questions ('Did you finish the chapter?') because process accountability triggers action while outcome accountability triggers anxiety.
When a trigger has not fired successfully in one week despite being needed, redesign it immediately by changing at least one of: salience, timing, modality, or context specificity.
Make social accountability reporting require near-zero effort (single emoji, shared spreadsheet checkbox, photo) rather than written explanations, because reporting friction kills trigger reliability.
Set your trigger signal-to-noise ratio threshold at 80% actionability minimum — remove any trigger that produces action fewer than 80% of times it fires.
Conduct monthly trigger audits by evaluating each trigger against four questions: Is it still firing? Do you respond when it fires? Is the behavior still relevant? Is calibration still correct?
Design triggers to work at your minimum cognitive state (tired, distracted, depleted) rather than your maximum state, because triggers must function when you need them most.
Before beginning deliberation on any decision, classify it as one-way door (irreversible/high-stakes) or two-way door (reversible/low-stakes) and allocate analysis time proportionally—minutes to hours for two-way doors, days to weeks for one-way doors.
For decisions involving three or more options and four or more criteria, externalize the comparison into a weighted decision matrix rather than relying on intuitive averaging, because working memory cannot hold all dimensions simultaneously.
When building a decision matrix, assign criterion weights before scoring any options to prevent unconscious adjustment of weights toward your pre-existing preference.
Score one criterion at a time across all options rather than one option at a time across all criteria, to force apples-to-apples comparison and reduce halo effects.
For each decision framework you build, explicitly include five components: evaluation criteria, sequence of evaluation, time budget, kill conditions (automatic disqualifiers), and decision rights (who decides, who is consulted).
For reversible decisions, act when you have 50-60% of desired information because experiential learning from outcomes typically exceeds information gain from additional deliberation.
After making irreversible commitments, schedule reviews with someone uninvolved in the original decision and define success/failure criteria in advance, because escalation of commitment will corrupt your post-decision assessment.
When facing a one-way door decision, actively search for ways to restructure it into a two-way door through trial periods, exit clauses, smaller pilots, or phased rollouts before committing to the heavyweight deliberation process.
For two-way door decisions where reversal costs under one week of effort, set a decision deadline of 24 hours or less regardless of how the decision feels emotionally.