Question
What does it mean that change the system to change the outcomes?
Quick Answer
Trying to change outcomes without changing systems produces temporary results at best. When outcomes are system properties (L-1661), durable change requires system redesign — modifying the structures, processes, incentives, and information flows that produce the current outcomes. Exhortation ("try.
Trying to change outcomes without changing systems produces temporary results at best. When outcomes are system properties (L-1661), durable change requires system redesign — modifying the structures, processes, incentives, and information flows that produce the current outcomes. Exhortation ("try harder"), training ("learn better"), and personnel changes ("get better people") all fail when the system itself is designed to produce the outcome you are trying to eliminate. The system always wins.
Example: A healthcare network, CarePoint, struggled with patient readmission rates. The initial response was individual: train nurses on better discharge instructions, coach doctors on more thorough discharge planning, add a patient education specialist. Readmission rates dropped slightly for two months, then returned to baseline. The system had reasserted itself. A systems analysis revealed why: discharge planning happened in the final hours of a patient's stay, when the care team was focused on the next admission. Follow-up appointments were scheduled by a different system than the one that managed the patient's care, creating gaps. Medication reconciliation happened on paper in a digital workflow, creating transcription errors. The pharmacy notification system did not flag potential drug interactions with the patient's pre-existing medications. CarePoint redesigned the system: discharge planning began at admission (structural change), follow-up scheduling was integrated into the care management system (process change), medication reconciliation was digitized with automatic interaction checking (technology change), and readmission rates became a team metric rather than an individual physician metric (incentive change). Readmission rates dropped 28% and stayed down — because the system now produced the desired outcome by default.
Try this: Take the system map you created in L-1661's exercise (the recurring outcome that frustrates you). For each system element you identified as a strong driver of the outcome, design a specific system change that would shift the outcome. For structural elements, ask: What structural redesign would make the desired behavior the path of least resistance? For incentive elements, ask: What measurement or reward change would align individual incentives with the desired outcome? For information elements, ask: What information, delivered to whom and when, would enable better decisions? For process elements, ask: What workflow change would eliminate the bottleneck or error source? Choose the one change with the highest leverage (biggest outcome impact for smallest implementation effort) and propose it to your team this week.
Learn more in these lessons