Question
What goes wrong when you ignore that sub-cultures within organizations?
Quick Answer
Attempting to eliminate sub-cultures in the name of cultural unity. Sub-cultures are not symptoms of cultural failure — they are adaptations to the different demands of different roles. Engineering needs a sub-culture that values precision and rigor because engineering mistakes can break.
The most common reason fails: Attempting to eliminate sub-cultures in the name of cultural unity. Sub-cultures are not symptoms of cultural failure — they are adaptations to the different demands of different roles. Engineering needs a sub-culture that values precision and rigor because engineering mistakes can break production systems. Sales needs a sub-culture that values speed and relationship-building because the sales context requires rapid response and personal connection. Forcing both groups into the same cultural norms would undermine both: engineers forced into sales-speed mode produce unreliable systems, and salespeople forced into engineering-rigor mode lose competitive deals. The failure mode is confusing cultural alignment (shared core values) with cultural uniformity (identical behavioral norms).
The fix: Map the sub-cultures in your organization. Start by identifying the groups: functions (engineering, marketing, sales, support), geographies (if applicable), hierarchical levels (leadership team, middle management, individual contributors), and tenure cohorts (founding team, early hires, recent hires). For each group, answer: (1) What does this group value most? (2) What behaviors are normal within this group that would be unusual in other groups? (3) What assumptions does this group hold about how work should be done? Then assess alignment: where are the sub-cultures aligned with each other and with the organizational primary culture? Where are they misaligned? For each misalignment, determine: is this a productive differentiation (the sub-culture is adapted to its specific context) or a harmful divergence (the sub-culture is pulling the organization in a conflicting direction)?
The underlying principle is straightforward: Organizations do not have a single culture — they have a primary culture overlaid with multiple sub-cultures that develop along functional, geographic, hierarchical, and tenure lines. Engineering has a sub-culture. Sales has a different one. The London office has a different one from the San Francisco office. The founding team has a different one from recent hires. These sub-cultures are not defects in cultural uniformity — they are natural adaptations to different work contexts. The challenge is not eliminating sub-cultures but managing their relationship to the primary culture: ensuring sufficient alignment on core values while allowing sufficient differentiation for functional effectiveness.
Learn more in these lessons