Question
Why does personal epistemology fail?
Quick Answer
Treating your epistemology as invisible — assuming you're just 'seeing the world as it is' rather than seeing it through a specific theory of what counts as knowledge. This is the most dangerous meta-schema to leave unexamined because it's the one deciding what evidence you accept, what arguments.
The most common reason personal epistemology fails: Treating your epistemology as invisible — assuming you're just 'seeing the world as it is' rather than seeing it through a specific theory of what counts as knowledge. This is the most dangerous meta-schema to leave unexamined because it's the one deciding what evidence you accept, what arguments you find persuasive, and what questions you think are even worth asking.
The fix: Write down your answers to these four questions: (1) Can knowledge be certain, or is all knowledge provisional? (2) Is knowledge something you receive from authorities or something you construct through experience? (3) Is the world fundamentally simple and knowable, or complex and partially unknowable? (4) Can someone know something without being able to articulate why? Now read your four answers as a system. That system is your personal epistemology — the meta-schema governing every other schema you hold.
The underlying principle is straightforward: Your epistemology — your theory of knowledge — is the meta-schema that governs all others.
Learn more in these lessons