Frequently asked questions about thinking, epistemology, and cognitive tools. 567 answers
Find a belief you hold now that contradicts something you believed three or more years ago. Write both versions down with dates: 'In [year], I believed [X]' and 'Now, in 2026, I believe [Y].' Then answer three questions: (1) What changed in the environment between then and now? (2) What changed in.
For one full workday, log every behavior change you notice — every time you switch tasks, open an app, stand up, reach for food, or check your phone. Next to each entry, write I (internal) or E (external). Internal: the impulse came from a feeling, thought, or physical sensation with no outside.
Identify your single most contested resource — the time block, tool, or capacity that multiple goals, habits, or commitments compete for most frequently. List every agent (goal, commitment, project) that claims access to that resource. For each claimant, write down: (1) how often it needs the.
Take 10 minutes. Write down 3 commitments you have been holding only in your head — things you intend to do but have not written anywhere. For each one, reformat it as an implementation intention: 'When [situation X], I will [behavior Y].' Example: 'When I open my laptop Monday morning, I will.
Schedule a 15-minute review session sometime in the next 48 hours. When the time comes: open every capture inbox you use (notes app, voice memos, email drafts, bookmarks, Slack saved items). For each item, make one of four decisions — act on it now, archive it somewhere retrievable, develop it.
Time your current capture workflow. Open a blank note on your phone or computer right now and start a stopwatch. Write a single sentence — any sentence. Stop the timer. If it took more than 5 seconds from intent to first keystroke, identify the friction: unlocking, finding the app, choosing a.
Pick one decision you made in the past week — it doesn't have to be big. Write down: (1) what you decided, (2) the 2-3 reasons that drove the decision, (3) what you expected to happen, and (4) what alternatives you rejected and why. Time yourself. This should take under 5 minutes. If it takes.
Choose one domain you interact with daily — your calendar, your codebase, your team standup, your inbox. Instead of scanning for what is there, spend five minutes writing down what is absent. What meetings are not happening? What topics never come up? What people never speak? What errors are not.
Choose a domain you organize — your notes, your project files, your reading list, your skill inventory. Pick five items and ask: does each item have exactly one parent, or does it genuinely belong in multiple categories? For each item with multiple natural parents, write down all the parents it.
Identify one contradiction you've been trying to resolve for months or years. Write it as two poles: 'I value X' and 'I value Y.' Now ask: is this a problem to solve, or a polarity to manage? If no amount of new information would make one side permanently win, you're looking at an irresolvable.
For the next seven days, record your emotional state three times daily — morning, midday, and evening. Use this format: [emotion word] — [intensity 1-10] — [context: what you were doing, who was present, what just happened]. Do not analyze. Do not fix. Just record. On day eight, read all.
Pick two ideas in your knowledge system that seem unrelated — one from your professional domain, one from a personal interest. Write both down. Now try to connect them in as few intermediate concepts as possible. Write each intermediate concept as a node. If you get stuck, try a different.
Identify one paradox in your own work or thinking — a place where two things you believe are both true and seem to contradict each other. Write both sides down as explicit statements. Then ask: is this a contradiction that can be resolved with more information, or is it a stable tension that.
Identify one area of your life or work where you experience recurring oscillation — energy levels, spending, task completion rates, or emotional states. Map the balancing loop: what is the set point (target), what is the sensor (how you detect deviation), and what is the corrective action? Write.
Pick three domains of your life: one professional, one relational, one about yourself. For each, write down the operating assumptions you bring to that domain — not what you think you *should* believe, but what your behavior reveals you *actually* believe. For example: 'In meetings, I assume the.
Pick one system in your life that you have spent time optimizing — a workflow, a tool, a routine. Write down: (1) What exactly did you optimize? (2) What evidence did you have that this was the bottleneck? (3) What would have happened if you had done nothing? If your honest answer to #2 is 'I.
Open a knowledge base, project folder, or bookmarks collection you actually use. Identify the top level (the broadest categories) and the leaf level (the individual items). Now look at the middle: are there intermediate levels that help you navigate from broad to specific? If the middle is missing.
Pick one system you operate — a creative practice, a fitness routine, a team process, a communication habit. Define three things: (1) the ideal behavior, (2) the minimum acceptable behavior, and (3) how many deviations from ideal you will tolerate per month before triggering a review. Write these.
Run an attention audit for one full workday. Set a timer that goes off every 30 minutes. Each time it sounds, write down two things: (1) what you are currently attending to, and (2) whether you deliberately chose to attend to it or drifted there. Use a simple notation — 'C' for chosen, 'D' for.
Set a timer for five minutes. At the top of a blank page, write: 'Right now I feel...' and complete the sentence. Do not stop writing. When you run out of one emotion, go deeper: 'Under that I feel...' or 'And alongside that I also feel...' Use specific emotion words — not 'bad' but 'frustrated,'.
Pick one belief or mental model you've updated in the last year. Write it down as 'Old schema: X → New schema: Y.' Then list every decision, habit, relationship, or system that was built on the old schema. For each one, mark it: already migrated, needs migration, or can't migrate yet. You now have.
Write a 'State of My Perception' audit (10-15 minutes). Four sections: (1) What do I consistently notice? List the types of thoughts, signals, and patterns you reliably catch. (2) What do I consistently miss? Where are your blind spots — emotions you suppress, assumptions you skip, contexts where.
Take one belief you currently hold about your work, career, or a project — something you'd state as a single sentence. Write it down. Now decompose it: list every assumption that must be true for that sentence to hold. Aim for at least four. For each assumption, ask: 'Have I actually tested this,.
Pick one situation from the last 24 hours that triggered a strong reaction. Write two separate entries: (1) the raw observation — only what a camera would record, and (2) the interpretation — what you concluded it meant. Look at the gap between them. That gap is where most of your errors live.