Frequently asked questions about thinking, epistemology, and cognitive tools. 190 answers
Identify one schema you currently operate on that you've never explicitly tested. Write it down as a single declarative sentence (e.g., 'My team values autonomy over guidance' or 'Our customers buy on price'). Now list three decisions you've made in the last month that this schema influenced. For.
Review the schemas you have built or encountered across Phase 11. Choose three — one you constructed from scratch, one you inherited and inspected, and one you discovered was flawed. For each, write a one-paragraph retrospective: What did it organize? What did it reveal that was previously.
Pick one domain of your life you actively manage — your task list, your bookshelf, your notes, your contacts. Write down the categories you currently use. Then invent a completely different classification system for the same items — organize by urgency instead of project, by emotional weight.
Pick a category you use frequently — in your work, your note system, your daily language. It might be 'urgent,' 'technical debt,' 'A-player,' or 'healthy food.' Write down three things: (1) Who created this category? (2) What purpose does it serve? (3) What does it make invisible? If you struggle.
Pick one domain where you currently sort things without written criteria — your email folders, your project labels, your bookmarks, your reading list. Write down the actual categories you use. Then, for each category, write a one-sentence definition that would let someone else sort items the same.
Find a decision you recently made using binary framing — approved/rejected, good/bad, yes/no. Write down the actual factors that influenced your judgment. How many distinct dimensions did you compress into two buckets? Rewrite the decision using a scale (1-5 or 1-10) for each dimension. Notice.
Pick one area where you currently use a binary classification — a decision is good or bad, a project is on track or off track, a colleague is reliable or unreliable. Replace the binary with a 5-point scale. Write out what a 1, 3, and 5 look like. Notice what becomes visible at positions 2 and 4.
Pick one area of your knowledge system (notes, bookmarks, project files) that currently uses a flat list of categories. Restructure it into a three-level hierarchy: superordinate (broadest grouping), basic (the level you naturally think at), and subordinate (the most specific). Notice which level.
Pick one category system you use daily — email folders, project labels, task statuses, note tags. Write down every category. Then ask two questions: (1) Can any single item legitimately belong in two or more of these categories? If yes, you have an overlap — your categories aren't mutually.
Pick one field, category, or label you use regularly in your work or personal system — a task status, a priority level, a project phase, a contact type. Write down its current 'type': what values are allowed? If the answer is 'anything,' define a constrained set of 3-5 valid values. Then audit.
Pick one recurring process in your life — a project, a piece of writing, a personal goal, a purchase. Map the lifecycle states it actually passes through from beginning to end. Write each state as a node. Draw arrows between them showing which transitions are allowed. Then ask: are there states.
Take your current task list — whatever tool you use. Assign every item one of four priority types: P0 (must happen today or something breaks), P1 (must happen this week or progress stalls), P2 (improves something but can wait), P3 (nice to have, no deadline). Count how many items land in each.
Pick a project or recurring meeting where responsibilities feel blurry. List every person involved. For each person, write one sentence that completes: '[Name] is the _____ for _____.' Use specific role types — owner, reviewer, advisor, executor, approver — not vague words like 'involved' or.
Pick one classification system you use daily — your task manager, your file system, your CRM, your notes app. Export or scan every category, tag, label, or folder. Look for: (1) duplicates with slightly different names, (2) categories that no longer match how you actually work, (3) catch-all.
Identify a classification system you currently use — in your work tools, your notes, your personal organization, your thinking about a relationship or a domain. Write down the categories. Then ask three questions: (1) Which items consistently resist classification — the ones you hesitate over,.
Pick a decision you made in the past six months that went wrong. Trace the failure backward: what category did you assign the situation to, and what actions did that category trigger? Now identify what category it actually belonged to and what actions that would have triggered instead. Write both.
Pick a system you use to organize something — your notes app, your email folders, your bookmarks, your task board. List every top-level category. Now ask: what is absent? What dimension of reality has no folder, no tag, no label? The things you never created categories for are the things your.
Pick a category you use frequently — 'productive day,' 'good meeting,' 'useful tool,' or 'interesting person.' Write down the prototype: what does the most typical example look like? Then list three items that belong to the category but feel less typical. Arrange them from most to least.
Pick one category system you use regularly — your task labels, your filing structure, your mental model of your team's roles, or your definition of 'done.' Find three items that don't fit cleanly into any single category. For each, write down: (1) which categories it partially belongs to, (2) what.
Choose a collection of 15-20 items you currently organize in a single-dimension system — notes in folders, tasks in lists, bookmarks in categories, contacts in groups. Identify three additional dimensions along which those same items could be meaningfully classified. For each item, assign a value.
Pick one classification system you use daily — your email labels, your task priorities, your contact groups. Write down three things that system compresses away (details it ignores) and three things it preserves (distinctions it keeps). Then ask: is the compression ratio right? Are you losing.
Pick the classification system you've used longest — your file folder structure, your task management categories, your note-taking tags, your bookshelf organization. Now conduct an evolution audit. First, write down the original categories as you remember them. Then write down the current.
Pick five concepts you've captured in your knowledge system. Write each one on a separate card or line. Now draw every connection you can identify between them — label each connection with a verb: 'causes,' 'enables,' 'contradicts,' 'supports,' 'requires.' Count the relationships. You should have.
Pick a domain where you make frequent judgments — your work, a hobby, a recurring decision. Write down five pairs of things you believe are related (e.g., 'morning exercise' and 'productive workday,' or 'client responsiveness' and 'project success'). For each pair, write one sentence articulating.