Frequently asked questions about thinking, epistemology, and cognitive tools. 9738 answers
Adjust other parts of your system to support the bottleneck rather than running at their own pace.
Adjust other parts of your system to support the bottleneck rather than running at their own pace.
Adjust other parts of your system to support the bottleneck rather than running at their own pace.
Adjust other parts of your system to support the bottleneck rather than running at their own pace.
Adjust other parts of your system to support the bottleneck rather than running at their own pace.
Adjust other parts of your system to support the bottleneck rather than running at their own pace.
Identify three non-bottleneck processes that currently feed into or interrupt your constraint (the bottleneck you identified and exploited in L-0945 and L-0946). For each one, answer: How much output does this process produce per day? How much of that output can my bottleneck actually consume per.
The most common failure is treating subordination as a permanent reduction rather than a strategic alignment. You cut your information inputs, cancel meetings, and restrict communication channels — and your colleagues think you have checked out. Subordination is not withdrawal. It is.
Adjust other parts of your system to support the bottleneck rather than running at their own pace.
Return to the bottleneck you have been measuring and exploiting throughout this phase. Write down your current throughput at the constraint after exploitation and subordination. Below it, write the throughput you need to keep your system flowing without accumulating queues. If the gap is zero or.
Elevating before exploiting. This is the most expensive mistake in the entire Theory of Constraints sequence. You hire a second person before you have ensured the first person is fully utilized. You buy a faster tool before you have removed the interruptions that prevent you from using the current.
Once exploited invest in increasing the capacity of the bottleneck.
The constraint shifts — return to step one and find the new bottleneck.
The constraint shifts — return to step one and find the new bottleneck.
The constraint shifts — return to step one and find the new bottleneck.
The constraint shifts — return to step one and find the new bottleneck.
The constraint shifts — return to step one and find the new bottleneck.
The constraint shifts — return to step one and find the new bottleneck.
The constraint shifts — return to step one and find the new bottleneck.
Return to the bottleneck you have been working on throughout this phase. Assume, hypothetically, that you have fully resolved it — that the constraint is gone, throughput at that stage is unlimited. Now ask: where does the queue build up next? What stage of your personal system would become the.
Inertia — continuing to optimize a constraint that is no longer binding. You built systems, habits, routines, and mental models around the old bottleneck. You invested effort. You are proud of the improvement. And now you keep tuning, refining, and protecting those systems even though the.
The constraint shifts — return to step one and find the new bottleneck.
Take the system you have been analyzing throughout this phase. Map every step from input to output. For each step, estimate its maximum throughput — the most units it could process per time period if nothing upstream were constraining it. Now mentally remove the current bottleneck. Which step has.
Assuming that fixing the primary bottleneck will solve the system. You invest weeks addressing the most visible constraint, succeed, and expect throughput to leap to your target. When it barely improves, you conclude that the intervention failed or that bottleneck analysis does not work. Neither.