Frequently asked questions about thinking, epistemology, and cognitive tools. 1675 answers
Moving an agent from design to daily operation takes time and deliberate effort.
Choose one cognitive agent you have designed but not yet deployed — or one you deployed but that never became consistent. Write down three things: (1) the date you first attempted to run this agent, (2) how many consecutive days it operated before the first failure, and (3) what happened after the.
Treating deployment as a binary event — 'I started the agent on March 1st' — rather than a process that unfolds over weeks. This produces the pattern where you design an excellent agent, attempt to run it, fail within days, conclude the design was wrong, redesign it, fail again, and eventually.
Moving an agent from design to daily operation takes time and deliberate effort.
New agents are most fragile in their first month — they need extra attention and support to survive.
New agents are most fragile in their first month — they need extra attention and support to survive.
New agents are most fragile in their first month — they need extra attention and support to survive.
Identify one agent you've deployed in the last 30 days — a habit, a decision rule, a review practice, anything you explicitly designed and started running. Write down: (1) How many times you've actually executed it. (2) What situations caused you to skip or override it. (3) Whether it has a.
Treating a newly deployed agent like an established one. You assume that because you designed it well and it worked the first few times, it will keep running on its own. It won't. New agents don't have the neural grooves, the environmental cues, or the social reinforcement that established agents.
New agents are most fragile in their first month — they need extra attention and support to survive.
Agents need regular maintenance — scheduled reviews prevent gradual degradation.
Agents need regular maintenance — scheduled reviews prevent gradual degradation.
Agents need regular maintenance — scheduled reviews prevent gradual degradation.
Agents need regular maintenance — scheduled reviews prevent gradual degradation.
Agents need regular maintenance — scheduled reviews prevent gradual degradation.
List your five most important cognitive agents — habits, routines, systems, or recurring commitments. For each one, write down: (a) When you last deliberately reviewed whether it was still working as designed. (b) What maintenance cadence it should have — monthly, quarterly, or semi-annually —.
Treating a working agent as a finished agent. The most common maintenance failure is not neglecting broken systems — it is neglecting functional ones. When something is working, there is no pain signal to trigger a review, no crisis to force attention. So the agent runs unexamined until it.
Agents need regular maintenance — scheduled reviews prevent gradual degradation.
Sometimes you should improve an existing agent; sometimes you should replace it entirely.
Sometimes you should improve an existing agent; sometimes you should replace it entirely.
Pick one agent you currently run — a habit, routine, decision framework, or mental model that feels sluggish or unreliable. Write two columns: 'Evolve' and 'Replace.' Under Evolve, list specific modifications you would make to restore or improve it. Under Replace, describe what a fresh agent.
Two opposite errors are equally common. The first is compulsive evolution — endlessly patching an agent that should have been retired three iterations ago, because you built it and you feel attached to it. The second is compulsive replacement — scrapping agents at the first sign of difficulty and.
Sometimes you should improve an existing agent; sometimes you should replace it entirely.
Track versions of your agents so you can compare, rollback, and learn from changes.