Definitionv1

Weighted decision matrix: a structured decision-making

Weighted decision matrix: a structured decision-making framework that externalizes priorities by systematically weighting criteria and scoring options across those criteria to make visible the structure of judgment and enable examination of trade-offs rather than replacing intuitive evaluation

Why This Is a Definition

This definition precisely establishes the semantic boundary of 'weighted decision matrix' by identifying its genus (structured decision-making framework) and differentia (systematically weighting criteria and scoring options to externalize priorities and make judgment structure visible). It distinguishes this from a decision machine by explicitly stating it is a 'decision mirror' that enables examination rather than replacing judgment.

Source Lessons

L-0444

The decision matrix for multi-criteria choices

Weight your criteria and score options systematically when multiple factors matter.

Connections

Defines (31)

AxiomCognition Operates Through Dual Processing Systems PrincipleTreat digital workspace design as cognitive architecture PrincipleLimit capture tools to 2-3 in a deliberate stack (fast PrincipleRoute work to the appropriate agent—human, system, tool, or PrincipleInstrument systems with the minimum number of metrics that PrincipleWhen multiple changes are made simultaneously,PrincipleWhen designing cognitive agents, examine the full pattern PrincipleRetire cognitive agents based on current value production PrincipleUse the 'five whys' technique on any significant energy PrincipleSelect tools based on how well they integrate with your PrincipleImplement automatic savings and investment transfers before PrincipleUse external systems (AI, writing, trusted others) to assess PrincipleRespond to emotional bids (small implicit requests for PrincipleWhen holding more power in a relationship (formal authority,PrincipleBreak work into dimensions and track energy response to each PrincipleWhen making decisions under cognitive load, time pressure,PrincipleTest value authenticity through sacrifice by examining what PrinciplePeriodically surface process schemas by extracting embedded PrincipleAssign decision authority to the lowest level with PrincipleDefine explicit escalation criteria specifying when PrincipleUse satisficing decision rules (define 'good enough'PrincipleAggregate predictions by confidence level and compare stated PrincipleWhen formal and intuitive schemas produce conflicting PrincipleCalculate your actual prediction accuracy across documented PrincipleTest each candidate classification dimension by asking PrincipleFor knowledge relationships, separate epistemic confidence PrincipleDesign systems based on Theory Y assumptions (people seek PrincipleApplying a single decision process across structurally PrincipleDecision deliberation effort should scale with PrincipleWhen two cognitive agents both claim authority over the same PrincipleSpecify every delegation with five components: concrete

Back to Concepts