The irreducible epistemic atoms underlying the curriculum. 4,828 atoms across 8 types and 2 molecules
When external knowledge structures stop being actively traversed, maintained, and integrated into daily reasoning, treat them as degraded assets rather than cognitive extensions.
Deliberately link contradicting ideas in your knowledge graph rather than keeping them in separate domains, because spatial proximity forces the cognitive confrontation that compartmentalization prevents.
Apply the cascade test to contradictions by asking 'If I resolved this, what else would have to change?' to distinguish surface contradictions (low dependency count) from deep contradictions (high dependency count).
Label each belief in your knowledge system with validity windows specifying the time period during which the belief held, converting apparent contradictions across time into explicit version transitions.
After experiencing a moment when previously separate frameworks 'click together', write down specifically what you can now do, see, or infer that was unavailable before the integration—this functional test distinguishes genuine structural integration from mere exposure effects disguised as insight.
Separate reference material (static information for lookup) from working notes (evolving thinking) into distinct systems, as mixing them corrupts both retrieval and development.